SYNTAX
William Cobbett on Syntax (1818) says :
“Syntax is a word which comes from the Greek. It means, in
that language, the joining of several things together; and, as used
by grammarians, it means those principles and rules which teach us how to put
words together so as to form sentences. It means, in short, sentence-making.
Having been taught by the rules of Etymology what are the
relationships of words, how words grow out of each other, how they are varied
in their letters in order to correspond with the variation in the circumstances
to which they apply, Syntax will teach you how to give all
your words their proper situations or places, when you come to put them
together into sentences.”
Fromkin and Rodman (1983) says :
“Syntax is
that part of our linguistics knowledge which concerns the structure of
sentences. Knowing a language also means being able to put words together to
form sentences to express our thoughts”.
O’grady (1989) says :
“Syntax is the system of rules and categories that allows words to be combined to the form of sentence. The data that linguists use to study syntax consists primarily of judgments about grammaticality of individual sentence. Roughly speaking, a sentence is considered grammatical if speakers judge it to be a possible sentence of their language”.
Hawkins (2001) says :
“The syntax
of a language is the set of properties which determine the construction of
sentences in that language. If a sentence is constructed according to those
properties it is well formed or grammatical. If a sentence is constructed in
violation of those properties it is ill-formed or ungrammatical. The study of
syntax involves uncovering those properties of language which are involved in
the construction of grammatical sentence in particular languages”.
Robert and Van Valin (2001) says :
“Syntax is a central component of human language.
Language has often been characterized as a systematic correlation between
certain types of gestures and meaning. It is not the case that every possible
meaning that can be expressed is correlated with a unique, unanalyzable
gesture, be it oral or manual. Rather, each language has stock of
meaning-bearing elements and different ways of combining them to express
different meaning, and these ways of combining them are themselves meaningful”.
Syntax can thus be given the following characterization, taken from Matthews (1982:1) the term ‘syntax’ is from the Ancient Greek syntaxis, a verbal noun which literally means ‘arrangement’ or ‘setting out together’. Traditionally, it refers to the branch of grammar dealing with the ways in which words, with or without appropriate inflections, are arranged to show connections of meaning within the sentence.
Similar to the explanation of Matthew, Robert and Van Valin (2001) expresses the essence of itself as the following syntax: “First and foremost, syntax deals with how sentences are constructed, and users of human language employ a striking variety of possible arrangements of the element in sentences”.
Chomsky (2002) says :
Syntax can thus be given the following characterization, taken from Matthews (1982:1) the term ‘syntax’ is from the Ancient Greek syntaxis, a verbal noun which literally means ‘arrangement’ or ‘setting out together’. Traditionally, it refers to the branch of grammar dealing with the ways in which words, with or without appropriate inflections, are arranged to show connections of meaning within the sentence.
Similar to the explanation of Matthew, Robert and Van Valin (2001) expresses the essence of itself as the following syntax: “First and foremost, syntax deals with how sentences are constructed, and users of human language employ a striking variety of possible arrangements of the element in sentences”.
Chomsky (2002) says :
“Syntax is
the study of the principles and processes by which sentences are constructed in
particular languages. Syntactic investigation of a given language has as its
goal the construction of a grammar that can be viewed as a device of some sort
for producing the sentences of the language under analysis”.
Tserdanelis and Wong (2004) says :
“The study
of syntax is the study of how words combine to from phrases and ultimately
sentences in languages. Because it consists of phrases that are put together in
a particular way, a sentences has a structure. The structure consists of way in
which the words are organized into phrases and the phrases are organized into
larger phrases. The study of phrases and sentences structure is sometimes
called grammar”.
From the
experts’ explanation above we can conclude that syntax is the study of
internal structure of sentences. In this case, it explains how words are
arranged become phrases and clauses for constructing sentence. It is commonly
we call structure. Structure manages how words can be combined with another for
creating good sentence.
Basic idea
of Syntax :
1. Word ordering and meaning
The order of
words in a sentences or phrases is connected to its literal meaning. The basic
underlying word order in an English sentence is subject-verb-object (S-V-O). (Murcia and Freeman, 1999). Consider the English sentences :
a. Joe writes poetry
The factors
determines the meaning of sentences: (1) the selection of words plays a role in
determining the literal meaning of the sentences, (2) the orders of words play
a role the literal meaning of the sentences. (Tserdanelis and Wong, 2004). See the two examples :
a. The
mat is on the cat
b. The
cat is on the mat
2. AmbiguityAs we have
studied before, there is factor determining what a sentence means. Consider the
following examples :
a. Can you tell me the time?
b. We had the president for dinner.
c. We need more intelligent
administrators.
d. Pat shot the soldier with a
telescope.
All three
sentences are ambiguous-that is, they have more than one meaning. The first
sentences is ambiguous because it can be used either as a straightforward
question (“ are you able to tell me the time?”) . we call this pragmatic
ambiguity. The second sentence is ambiguous because the
expression have for dinner can mean either “ host for dinner”
or “ have for dinner”. This type of ambiguity is called lexical
ambiguity. The third sentence , this sentence also has two meaning. On one
meaning, we need administrators who are more intelligent. On the other meaning,
we need a grater number of intelligent administrators. The type of ambiguity is
called structure ambiguity. (Tserdanelis
and Wong, 2004).
No comments:
Post a Comment